Open the app
  1. Home
  2. Lessons
  3. GCSE Psychology
  4. Key study: Young (2007) CBT with internet addicts

Key study: Young (2007) CBT with internet addicts

๐ŸŽฌ The doodle video for this lesson is coming soon. Subscribe on YouTube to see it first.

Can CBT help people whose internet use has got out of control? Kimberly Young tested this with clients at an online addiction clinic.

Aim and procedure

Aim: to investigate whether CBT is an effective treatment for internet addiction, both during treatment and six months later.
Sample: 114 clients at the Center for Online Addiction in the USA; 42% were women. All were screened with the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) to confirm the problem.
Procedure: clients received online CBT sessions over 12 sessions with a therapist. CBT helped them identify their problem applications and triggers, manage their time online, and challenge thoughts that justified overuse.
Outcomes were measured with a Client Outcome Questionnaire (12 questions on a 5-point scale) after the 3rd, 8th and 12th sessions and at a 6-month follow-up. Areas included motivation, online time management, social relationships, offline activities and abstaining from problem applications.

Results and conclusion

Results: the most common problem applications included adult content, online chat and gambling. Clients reported problems with time management (96%), relationships (85%) and work (71%).
Ratings on the questionnaire improved from the 3rd session onwards. Most clients were managing their symptoms by the 8th session, and improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion: CBT is an effective treatment for internet addiction, and its benefits last after therapy ends.

Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths: a fairly large sample; measured at several points including a follow-up, showing long-term effects; useful practical application for a modern problem.
Weaknesses: outcomes were self-reported, so clients may have exaggerated progress (social desirability). There was no control group without treatment, so we cannot be sure CBT caused the improvement. Most clients were well educated and white, so the results may not generalise.
Worked example

Why did Young measure outcomes at a 6-month follow-up as well as during therapy?

  1. Improvements during therapy might not last.
  2. A follow-up shows whether benefits continue after therapy ends.

Answer: To find out whether CBT has long-term benefits that last after treatment ends.

Key idea

Young gave 114 internet-addicted clients 12 online CBT sessions and measured outcomes at sessions 3, 8 and 12 and at 6 months. Most managed symptoms by session 8, and improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. CBT works for internet addiction, but data were self-reported and there was no control group.

Check you have got it

Answer 6 quick questions with instant marking. If you get one wrong, GCSE-ready shows you why and gives you another go. It is free, and you do not need an account.